U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. GreenU.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Green
Cohn & Roth, LLC, Mineola, NY (Kevin T. MacTiernan of counsel), for appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Diccia T. Pineda-Kirwan, J.), entered May 5, 2017, and October 12, 2017, respectively. The order entered May 5, 2017, denied the plaintiff‘s unopposed motion for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of reference. The order entered May 5, 2017, denied the plaintiff‘s unopposed renewed motion for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of reference
ORDERED that the order entered October 12, 2017, is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiff‘s renewed motion for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of reference is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered May 5, 2017, is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal from the order entered October 12, 2017, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff commenced this residential mortgage foreclosure action against various defendants, including the borrowers Taysha Green and Liza Green. None of the defendants appeared in the action. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of reference. In an order entered May 5, 2017, the Supreme Court denied the unopposed motion, holding, among other things, that the affidavit of merit submitted in support thereof, executed by an officer of the plaintiff‘s loan servicer, Caliber Home Loans, Inc. (hereinafter Caliber), was not accompanied by a valid power of attorney establishing Caliber‘s authority to act as the plaintiff‘s attorney-in-fact.
An applicant for a default judgment against a defendant must submit proof of service of the summons and complaint, proof of the facts constituting the claim, and proof of the defaulting defendant‘s failure to answer or appear (see HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Clayton, 146 AD3d 942, 944; see
Here, the plaintiff‘s unopposed renewed motion for a default judgment was facially adequate pursuant to
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff‘s renewed motion for leave to enter a default judgment and an order of reference.
The plaintiff‘s appeal from the order entered May 5, 2017, has been rendered academic in light of our determination on the appeal from the order entered October 12, 2017.
CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court