History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tyler v. Healey
51 Cal. 191
Cal.
1875
Check Treatment
By the Court:

When the defendant had partially examined one of his witnesses, he desired to recall him for further examination on matters material to the issue, and asked the leave of the court to recall him for that purpose. ■ On the objection of plaintiff, the court refused to permit the witness to be re*193called, on the ground that “the court has no discretion (to permit it) against the objection of the plaintiff.” The ruling is too clearly erroneous to merit discussion.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a. new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Tyler v. Healey
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1875
Citation: 51 Cal. 191
Docket Number: No. 4421
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.