History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tuttle v. Hunt
2 Cow. 436
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1823
Check Treatment
Curia.

The service of the summons by the plaintiff himself was good. The rule adopted in Bennet v. Fuller, (4 John. Rep. 486,) is this: that where no bail is exacted the Sheriff may serve a capias in his own favor ; and any other plaintiff may, under similar circumstances, be deputed to serve his own process. The return was sufficient. (Legg v. Stillman et al. ante, 418.) But the error in admitting proof of the plaintiff’s declaration is fatal, though the Jusice directed the jury to disregard it. (Penfield v. Carpenter, 13 John. 350.)

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tuttle v. Hunt
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1823
Citation: 2 Cow. 436
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.