midpage

Tuttle v. GoldTuttle v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1957
Versions:3 A.D.2d 760
160 N.Y.S.2d 82
1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6280

Plaintiff was taking in wash from a clothesline which ran from the window of her third-floor apartment in defendant’s building to a clothes pole in the rear yard. The pole snapped and fell to the ground and plaintiff, in an effort to avoid being pulled out of the window, sustained the injuries for which she brought this action in the County Court, Nassau County. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion appellant made out a prima facie ease. Respondent was duty bound to use reasonable care by way of inspection at appropriate intervals to determine whether the pole was reasonably safe for use. (Sizse v. Wegmann, 169 App. Div. 112.) It was for the jury to say whether or not the failure to use reasonable care constituted negligence. (Fornagiel v. Wacholder, 247 App. Div. 305, 308, affd. 272 N. Y. 589.) Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Uahetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Tuttle v. Gold
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 11, 1957
Citations: 3 A.D.2d 760; 160 N.Y.S.2d 82; 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6280
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In