History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tuttle v. Apgar
88 N.J.L. 742
N.J.
1915
Check Treatment
Pur Curiam.

This case was tried before Judge Lloyd in the. Middlesex Circuit Court without a jury, who gave judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and defendants appealed.

The record brought up fails to show any request to the trial court, by the appealing party, to make a finding or findings of law or fact, or law and fact, or any exception or objection to the adverse finding made. On this record there is nothing to be reviewed. Blanchard Brothers v. Beveridge, 86 N. J. L. 561. See, also, Webster v. Freeholders of Hudson, Id. 256.

The judgment, under review must be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Syvayze, Teenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vbedkxbuegh, White, Teehune, HepPJENHEIMKR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOE, JJ. 16.

Fo reversal—Kone.

Case Details

Case Name: Tuttle v. Apgar
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 30, 1915
Citation: 88 N.J.L. 742
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.