Tuscaloosa County Commission v. Cosby
796 So. 2d 1099 | Ala. Civ. App. | 1999
Lead Opinion
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. RApp.P.; Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App.1999); and White v. Searcy, 634 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App.1994).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I conclude that the county and Tinsley are entitled to discretionary function immunity. See Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (Crawley, J., dissenting); and Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).