Tuscaloosa County Commission v. Cosby

796 So. 2d 1099 | Ala. Civ. App. | 1999

Lead Opinion

MONROE, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. RApp.P.; Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App.1999); and White v. Searcy, 634 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App.1994).

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. CRAWLEY, J., dissents.

---

Dissenting Opinion

CRAWLEY, Judge,

dissenting.

I conclude that the county and Tinsley are entitled to discretionary function immunity. See Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (Crawley, J., dissenting); and Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).