History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turpin v. Maxwell
2 Ohio St. 2d 234
Ohio
1965
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this action, petitioner is attacking the validity of his indictment, the mittimus taking him to the penitentiary, the execution of the warrant to convey and, generally, the jurisdiction of the trial court.

These issues are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must be raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 136.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur,

Case Details

Case Name: Turpin v. Maxwell
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 9, 1965
Citation: 2 Ohio St. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 39338
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.