Turner v. TurnerTurner v. Turner
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the plaintiff an attorney‘s fee in the sum of $10,000. In reaching this determination, the court properly considered the relative financial circumstances of the parties, the relative merit of their positions, and the fact that the defendant‘s attorney prolonged the litigation by failing to appear at the scheduled attorney‘s fee hearing (see Formica v Formica, 101 AD3d 805, 807 [2012]; Morales v Inzerra, 98 AD3d 484, 485 [2012]; Ventimiglia v Ventimiglia, 36 AD3d 899 [2007]; cf. Baron v Baron, 71 AD3d 807, 810-811 [2010]).
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.