Turner v. StateTurner v. State
Henry James Turner appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence thereon. He contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea made when the trial judge imposed restitution in addition to the sentence which the trial judge forecast during a plea conference.
The record demonstrates that the length of sentence coincided with the discussions before the court. However, the court never raised the possibility of restitution during the plea negotiations, and neither the judge nor the prosecutor gave appellant notice and opportunity to be heard upon the issue. Reeves v. State, 372 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Further, the trial judge imposed restitution on appellant alone for the
Accordingly, we affirm appellant‘s conviction and the prison sentence, and remand with directions to strike that part of the sentence which imposes restitution.
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED IN PART.
HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.