History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turner v. City of New York
297 A.D.2d 285
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2002
|
Check Treatment

*286The jury determination that the defendants were negligent, but that their negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident, was not inconsistent (see Campbell v Crimi, 267 AD2d 343; Gomez v Park Donuts, 249 AD2d 266; Miglino v Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 243 AD2d 451, 452). In addition, the verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Turner v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Aug 5, 2002
Citation: 297 A.D.2d 285
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.