Case Information
*1
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
APPEILANIS PRO-SE MOTION EOR COURT APPENETED CONSERF EOR INDIGENT APPELANT IN FILMEFERENTMAN FOR DISCRETIONAAY REVIEN SEP 152015 TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: CORDES NOW RESPETENLY GREGARY A TUMBER SA PETITIONER PRO-SE IN THE BBOVE STYICD AND NUITIDERED CAUSE WHOPI PROCEEDING IN PRO-SE FIIES AND SUBMILY THIS MOTION FOR COURT APPENETEELLED IN- CONSER IN FILME PETITION FOR DISCRETIONAAY REVIEN AND FACRIMINAL APPEALS SUPPORT THE PETITIONER UNIV SHOW: SEP 182015 I Abel Acosta, Clerk
THAT THE APPELANT IS INDIGENT AND WAS APPENETED CONSERIEN BOTH DISTRICT COURT CASE AND ON APPEAL AND DETERMANT IAPPELANT HAD NO SAY IN WHAT WAGID BE USED IN EITHET CAUSE AND PETITIONET HST IN TREXANT COUNIY COURT S, BOTH DISTRICT COURT AND APPEALS II THE PETITIONER IREY THE IEGMl SHIIS AND SOPHISTICATION TO UNDUE THE INCOMPETENT REPRESENTATION BENDEAED TO THE DETERMANT AND THE APPELANT IN BOTH DISTRICT COURT CAUSE AND APPEALS CAUSE: III THE PETITIONER MENWIS THAT HIS ATELANEYS VIOIDED HIS DUE PROCESS FIGHTS IN BOTH DISTRICT COURT CAUSE AND APPEALS, DUE ALLOWING AN MEMMREY OF DETERMANT AAGE TO BE SALCH FUUM TUEY PARKLAMAT CLOSE EXHAUMING STATE WITNESS AND SUPPLISEN OF EVIDENCE FUYORABLE TO THE DETERNE AMONG OTHER VIOIDTION IN DISTRICT COURT CASE THAT APPEAL ATELNAEY FAIRED TO RAISE CONSTITUTION CIRIGNS ON APPEAL THATS INCOMPETENT COUNSEL
*2 THE APPLMENT FEEIS AND HNOUN THAT THE COURT OF CAUSINMAL APPERI HELI DEEN WITH THE PETITIONER PARKY AND JUSTLY IN THIS ICEM CAUSE AND WILl AENIEL AEEQUEST BEFORE MADING A DECISION.
LILHEBEFORE THE PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THE HONOBAQUE COURT OF CAUSINMAL APPERIS WILI GABNT THE INDIGENT PETITIONER MATIEN FOR COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL IN FILING PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW.
MESPECTFULY SUMMITED ON THIS THE SEP DAY OF SEE 2015 STUDENT OF THE SELF EMPLOY 58 CIRCARY ACTUATION OBOSS 233 100 N. 184443 T. F. W. JOATH TE 445 16196
ORDER CASE ON THIS THE DAY OF 2015 PETITIONER MOTION FOR COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT PETITIONER IN FILING PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW MAVING BEEN PACSENTED TO THE COURT AND THE COURT MAVING CONSIDERED SAID METION AND HEARBY GABNTS/DEMIED AND OLDERS AS FOLIOUS.
*3 CONFLICT OF TALTEREST ATD BNEY AT HU: I WATAFN ST TOMN THE APPENDANTS BFFERES ATD BNEY AND THO AND OF THE DEPENDANTS DISTRICT COLLST ATD BNEY WORACD TOGETHER DIDNE THE TIME THAT ATD BNEY ST TOMN WAS PROPORING APPENDENT APPENS DRIEF CERATING ACONFLICT OF INTEACT A CONFLICT EALST WHEN COUNSEL AACES HATSEIF EN A POSITION CONDUCIVE TO DIVIDED LOYALTYS, UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUION STE ADIENO AND TEXAS CONST SET, AAT, O DEPENDANI WAS A CONDITIONAL BLENT TO COUNSEL THAT I'S EREF FROOM ANV CONFLICT OF INTEACT IN THIS CASE THE DEPENDANTS DISTRICT COLLST ATD BNEY 77,01 ITNCE APPENDANTS APPENS HITGBNEY I WATEN ST TOMN WYARING AS COCCUNSEL FOR THE DEPENSE TO THE AMERICAN TMEFFE CASE THIS All TOOLS PIACE DUDINE THE SAME TIME FAMIL THAT APPANS ATD BNEY I WATEN ST TOMN WAS APPLNITED TO BEFACSCAN AND FIIE APPENDENT DRIEF ADVANEY ST TOMN TOB I S AND WAS TO AMSTER THE THIAT TRANSCRITT AND TO FIND EARW/75 THAT OR TO BE ADVANCED ON BFFERES CASE WHIC AT SAME THOIC WORTHING AND PREPARING A XEEN DEPENSE WITH APRICANT FORWICH DISTRICT COLLT ATD BNEY TOM-INGUAY THE FACT IS THIS PARTNERSHIP CREATED A RSTIONCONDUCTIVE TO DIVIDED IS LAILTYS AND A CONFLICT OF INTEGRST THE FACT THAT APPENDANTS FORWICH DISTRICT COLLT ATD BNEY TOMINGUAY AND APPAIL ATD BNEY I WATENST THIAT COCCUNSEL IN THE AVERICAN TMEFFE Case DUDINE THE SAME THIC FROME AS APPENDING APPEND DRIEF WAS BEING PROFERED BY ADVANEY I WAYEN ST TOMN ITT TMEFFEENTIY UNIFHIR AND UNDERHINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE TUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEPRILVEO THE APPENDENT TO THE BICHT OF EFFECTIVE ASSITANCE OF COUNSEL STATE BACALLE ASTTOSY DUELLOE UNDIVIDED IS LAILY STATE OF TEXAS EOOIE WHY TOTH OUE OF WISSE CO. TEXAS AICH ATLLINGY WAYNEF THIS CASE
*4
Verification of Unawom Declamation
16.55084 TUMOR, Defendant pro se in this cause, state the followingunder penalty of perjury: I am a prisoner, #OBO5233_ currently incarcerated in the Tarrant County Jail in Tarrant County, Texas. I am duly qualified and authorized in all respects to make this declaration. I have read the foregoing Declaration of Conflict and declare that I have personal knowledge of the facts contained therein and said facts are true and correct.
EXECUTED in Tarrant County, Texas, pursuant to Art. 132.001 et. seq., Texas C.P.R.C. and 28 USC , on this day of .
Measur a Hirec 511
[Defendant's Name], Defendant Pro Se CID #OBO5233 DOB/6/16/58 100 N. Lamar St. - Fort Worth, TX 76102-1954 *Under both federal law (28 USC ) and state law (Art. 132.001, Texas C.P.R.C.), inmates incarcerated in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a written declaration sworn before a notary public.
Certificate of Service
I, G. H.T, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above motion was served on Attorney for the State Tim Curry by mailing via first-class mail to JOE SHANNON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 401 W. BELKNAP ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76196 on this .
Homa a Lume 5
[Defendant's Name], Defendant Pro Se CID #OBO5233 DOB/0/16/58 100 N. Lamar St. - Fort Worth, TX 76102-1954