History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turman v. State
60 S.W.2d 1117
Tex. Crim. App.
1933
Check Treatment
MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of an automobile is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. No bills of exception are found in the record.

In the motion for new trial, the indictment is attacked upon the ground of improper aver-ments touching two alleged previous convictions. We fail to perceive any averments of that character in the indictment. Neither have we perceived any irregularity in the procedure which would require a reversal or call for further discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Turman v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 17, 1933
Citation: 60 S.W.2d 1117
Docket Number: No. 15963
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.