History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turman v. Ingram
50 Okla. 47
Okla.
1915
Check Treatment

This cause was filed in this court November 12, 1912, and on May 21, 1915, plaintiffs in error filed a very elaborate brief. The defendant in error has filed no brief, offered no excuse for not doing so, and has asked for no extension of time in which to file brief. We have examined the brief of plaintiffs in error and find the contention of plaintiffs in error reasonably supported by their brief. And it is the settled policy of this court, where such is the case, not to search for a theory upon which the judgment can be affirmed; but, if the plaintiff in error's brief reasonably sustains his contention, to reverse the judgment.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 49

Case Details

Case Name: Turman v. Ingram
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Jul 13, 1915
Citation: 50 Okla. 47
Docket Number: 4538
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.