History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turchin v. Warton
260 A.D. 447
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion should have been granted, for the reasons that the chattel when mortgaged was situated in the city of New York, and the mortgagor was a resident of Westchester county, State of New York. Therefore, the mortgage should have been filed in the county of Westchester as well as in the county where the chattel was located. (See Lien Law, §§ 230 and 232.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — ■ Martin, P. J., OMalley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Turchin v. Warton
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 1, 1940
Citation: 260 A.D. 447
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.