History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus River Water Co.
10 Cal. 395
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

It is unnecessary to examine the various errors assigned in the brief of counsel, as the fourth exception is fatal to respondents’ case, under the decision of Drake v. Eakin, at the present term. On the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus River Water Co.
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 10 Cal. 395
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.