History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tunsil v. State
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7749
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2006
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).

Case Details

Case Name: Tunsil v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 17, 2006
Citation: 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7749
Docket Number: No. 3D06-884
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Tunsil v. State, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7749