Tunsil v. State

No. 3D06-884 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | May 17, 2006


Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So. 2d 428" date_filed="2005-04-06" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Reese v. State">899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So. 2d 651" date_filed="2001-10-24" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Tunsil v. State">797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).