History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tudor v. State
123 Tex. Crim. 580
Tex. Crim. App.
1933
Check Treatment
MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The proceedings appear regular. The evidence heard upon the trial is not brought up for review. There are no bills of exception in the record. We have been favored with no brief for the appellant.

Objections were urged against the charge of the court, but in the absence of knowledge of the evidence that was before the trial judge, this court is without any measure by which to determine the accuracy of the charge and must indulge the presumption that the trial court correctly instructed the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tudor v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 3, 1933
Citation: 123 Tex. Crim. 580
Docket Number: No. 15913
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.