History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tucker v. State
102 Ga. 571
Ga.
1897
Check Treatment
Fish, J.

1. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to set it aside.

2. Some of the newly discovered evidence-might, by proper diligence, have been known before the trial, and none of it was other than cumulative or impeaching in its character.

3. No cause for granting a new trial appears.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Tucker v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 11, 1897
Citation: 102 Ga. 571
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.