History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tucker v. Macrosan, Inc.
101 So. 2d 617
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1958
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made, and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Tucker v. Macrosan, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 26, 1958
Citation: 101 So. 2d 617
Docket Number: No. 58-143
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.