History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tucker v. Crossley
31 S.E. 757
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
•Cobb, J.

The charges complained of were not erroneous. While the evidence seems to preponderate in favor of the plaintiff, there was some evidence to support a finding in favor of the defendant; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not control his discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment afflrmed.

All concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Tucker v. Crossley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 19, 1898
Citation: 31 S.E. 757
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.