75 Md. 188 | Md. | 1892
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mary M. McKinstry died on the twenty-eighth of December, eighteen hundred and ninety, and on the thirteenth of January following letters of administration upon her estate were committed to her brother, Mordecai C. McKinstry. On the twenty-fifth of the succeeding March the administrator brought into and filed in the Orphans’ Court of Carroll County a Bible which had belonged to the decedent; and upon the last leaf in the back thereof there was written, in the hand-writing of the deceased, the following; “ $5,000 for West. Md. College; $1,000 of it to be given to the Theological Semiuary, $1,000 to Ward Hall. The $3,000 to be given to the main college. July 18, 1883. Mamie McKinstry.” Subsequently the Trustees of Western Maryland College,
When the case was argued before us we were all of opinion that the paper was entitled to be admitted to probate; and we were of that opinion because prior to the adoption of the Act of 1884, ch. 293, no more formality was required in the execution of a will disposing of personal property than Miss McKinstry observed in this instance, and we were under the impression that the second section of that statute, expressly saving from the operation of the' Act itself all wills bequeathing only personal estate, and executed prior to the first day of August,' eighteen hundred and eighty-four, was still the law of Maryland. The Act just alluded to required that all wills disposing of personal estate, in order to be valid must be in writing, signed by the party or by some other person for him, and attested and subscribed in the presence of the said testator by two or more credible witnesses. The second section declared “that this Act shall not affect or be applicable in anywise to auy will or bequest executed prior to the first day» of August, 1884.”
.Without pausing to advert to the many adjudged cases decided hy this Oourt, it is sufficient to say that, if the statute law of Maryland had stood at the date of the death of Miss McKinstry as it did stand before' and for more than five years after the execution of her will, that
By this omission from the Code a result has been brought about the very reverse of that contemplated by the Legislature which passed the Act of 1884, but the Courts are utterly powerless to afford relief.
Order affirmed, the costs to he paid out of the estate of Mary M. McKinstry.