History
  • No items yet
midpage
347 N.C. 262
N.C.
1997
PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Eagles. We hold that plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Case Details

Case Name: Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 3, 1997
Citations: 347 N.C. 262; 490 S.E.2d 238; 1997 N.C. LEXIS 657; No. 524A96
Docket Number: No. 524A96
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust, 347 N.C. 262