History
  • No items yet
midpage
Truesdail v. Sanderson
33 Mo. 532
Mo.
1863
Check Treatment
Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below properly excluded Field’s testimony of statements made by Myerson. They were hearsay merely, and nothing is shown to justify their introduction. For anything that appears in the record, Myerson was himself a competent and available witness. It was proper to exclude testimony by another of his statements.

There was no evidence tending to prove some of the matters stated in the petition, which were necessary to constitute the cause of action set up therein. The judgment for the defendant was properly rendered, and is affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Truesdail v. Sanderson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1863
Citation: 33 Mo. 532
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.