History
  • No items yet
midpage
Trueblood v. Talkington
188 P. 159
Or.
1920
Check Treatment
BEAN, J.

~We concur in the finding of the learned trial judge, that the services were reasonably worth the sum of $100, and that after deducting the reasonable value of defendant Talkington’s labor there was due plaintiff the amount decreed. It appears by a preponderance of the evidence that, owing to conditions prevailing that season, no uniform charges for threshing- per sack or bushel could safely be made; that no specific agreement was made by the parties as to price; and that the amount claimed by plaintiff was reasonable.

The trial judge heard the witnesses, and had an opportunity to observe their demeanor on the stand, *529and his conclusion as to the weight of the testimony is of great importance.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Johns and Bennett, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Trueblood v. Talkington
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 16, 1920
Citation: 188 P. 159
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.