Trout v. Williams
281 P. 224 | Okla. | 1929
The question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error herein in Lavina, Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank,
It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be and the same is hereby affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except RILEY, J., dissenting, and HEFNER, J., not participating.