midpage

Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, LteeTronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee

New York Court of Appeals
Apr 8, 2003
Versions:

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

In this wrongful death action, plaintiff submitted sufficient proof in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment to create a triable issue of fact as to whether asbestos fibers manufactured by the defendant were supplied to decedent’s employer during his tenure there. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied under the relevant law of either New Jersey or New York.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum; Judge Read dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (297 AD2d 528, 529-531 [2002]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 8, 2003
Citations: 99 N.Y.2d 647; 790 N.E.2d 269; 760 N.Y.S.2d 96; 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 405
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In