History
  • No items yet
midpage
Trimming v. State
253 So. 2d 720
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1971
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury and adjudicated guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: Grand Larceny. On this appeal it is urged that the trial court erred in allowing a rebuttal witness to testify over appellant’s objection. The rebuttal witness was properly called to rebut by prior, inconsistent statements the testimony of the appellant given in his own behalf. Barkley v. State, 152 Fla. 147, 10 So.2d 922 (1942).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Trimming v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 26, 1971
Citation: 253 So. 2d 720
Docket Number: No. 71-592
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.