History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tremblay v. Lippman
264 So. 2d 30
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Braddock v. Seaboard Airline R. Co., Fla.1955, 80 So.2d 662; Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Magoffin, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 626; Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company, Fla.1961, 130 So.2d 580; Urga v. State, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 719; Atlas Properties, Inc. v. Didich, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 278; Nimnicht v. Ostertag, Fla.App.1969, 225 So.2d 459; Laskey v. Smith, Fla.1970, 239 So.2d 13; Riley v. Jackson, Fla.App.1971, 246 So.2d 625; Threets v. Hardison, Fla.1971, 255 So.2d 267.

Case Details

Case Name: Tremblay v. Lippman
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 5, 1972
Citation: 264 So. 2d 30
Docket Number: No. 71-994
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.