History
  • No items yet
midpage
Trego v. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts
2 Sadler 313
| Pa. | 1886
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The manifest meaning of the proposal is that prizes would be given in pursuance of awards, and not contrary thereto.

The persons who shall compose the jury of awards are stated in the offer. They were to constitute the tribunal to pass upon the merits of the paintings, and to decide to which prizes should be awarded. Unless so awarded by this jury no prize was demandable. There was, therefore, no error in entering judgment for the defendant on the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Trego v. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 19, 1886
Citation: 2 Sadler 313
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.