History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tredway v. Kennedy
153 Pa. 438
Pa.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The only error assigned is that the court below refused to enter judgment for the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

It is only in a very clear ease that we will reverse the court below for such refusal, as the effect of it is to send the parties to a jury to determine their rights. The advantage of bringing this class of cases here is more than counterbalanced by the additional expense and delay which it involves.

While the defendant’s affidavit is not as full and particular as it might have been, we think it sufficient to prevent judgment. The plaintiff’s claim is for services as an attorney at *440law. The defendant expressly denies each item of charge set forth in his affidavit of claim. She says that she never employed the plaintiff, and therefore owes him nothing. A jury will have to settle these questions of fact.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tredway v. Kennedy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 1893
Citation: 153 Pa. 438
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 281
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.