History
  • No items yet
midpage
Travis Marcellaus Edwards v. State
01-15-00418-CR
| Tex. App. | Dec 21, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 11:06:48 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00416-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 11:06:48 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK No. 01-15-00416-CR, No. 01-15-00417-CR, No. 01-15-00418-CR

In the

Court of Appeals

For the First District of Texas At Houston

 No. 1353154, 1443321, 1443322 In the 228 th District Court Of Harris County, Texas  TRAVIS MARCELLAUS EDWARDS Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

 STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF  To the Honorable Court of Appeals:

The State of Texas, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 2 and

10.5, moves for an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief. The

following facts are relevant:

1. The appellant was indicted for aggravated assault, aggravated

robbery, and as a felon in possession of a firearm. Appellant pled not

guilty, but a jury convicted him of all three offense, and the trial court

sentenced him to 30 years on the aggravated assault and aggravated

robbery, and 10 years on the possession of the weapon. Appellant

filed timely notice of appeal.

2. Appellant filed an appellate brief on November 24, 2015.

3. The State’s appellate brief is due on December 28, 2015.

4. This is the State’s first request for an extension in this case.

5. The State requests an extension of time in which to file its brief, and

the undersigned attorney believes that a brief will be filed on or

before February 22, 2016. The undersigned requests a lengthier than

usual extension for the reasons addressed below, and in hopes of

avoiding any further extension requests.

6. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for an

extension of time to allow the State to file its brief:

a. At present, the Harris County District Attorney’s Office

employees 15 appellate prosecutors, but one on maternity leave

and has no caseload, and another was recently hired and is

currently handling a less intensive caseload as she transitions

from acting as a trial prosecutor to working as an appellate

prosecutor. Moreover, the Division Chief is unable to carry a

full case load because of his administrative duties. Accordingly,

the remaining members of the appellate division are currently

assigned a caseload of approximately 68 active cases resulting

in an average of 5.2 briefs per prosecutor.

b. The attorney to whom this case is assigned has four

outstanding briefs including this one.

c. In the last 30 days the undersigned filed the following brief:

Glover v. State , No. 14-15-00082-CR, Hurd v. State , No. 14-

1500343-CR, Williams v. State , No. 14-15-00220-CR and In re

N.T. , No. 01-15-00970-CV. She will file a brief in Jones v. State ,

No. 01-15-00488-CR tomorrow. And she must begin and

complete work on Cervantes v. State , No. 01-14-00875-CR

before she can begin work on this brief.

d. The workload of this prosecutor is not out of the ordinary in

the appellate division of the Harris County District Attorney’s

Office.

e. In addition to its assignments in responding to appellate briefs,

the appellate division of the Harris County District Attorney’s

Office also answers questions from trial prosecutors. These

questions frequently occur in the middle of or immediately

before trial, and therefore other work must be put aside to

answer these pressing questions. Harris County has 25

Criminal District Courts and 15 County Criminal Courts at Law,

and this particular prosecutor is tasked with answering

questions related to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article

39.14 regarding discovery changes, is one of two prosecutors

tasked with answering any juvenile law related questions, and

answers questions from five felony courts, and the three

juvenile courts.

f. The Harris County District Attorney’s Office Appellate Division

is experiencing a significant workload at present. Appellate

prosecutors, including the undersigned attorney, are working as

quickly as possible to complete as many briefs as possible while

still addressing all the issues raised by appellants, as thoroughly

as necessary to see that justice is done on each appeal. Because

of the high workload per prosecutor, as well as the greater

length and complexity of appeals being brought in this county, it

often takes longer to process all of the assigned cases, and more

cases require multiple extensions, or in this case a more lengthy

extension, before the completion of the State’s brief.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension until February 22, 2016.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jessica A. Caird J ESSICA A. C AIRD Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002-1923 (713) 274-5826 caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net TBC No. 24000608 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I have requested that efile.txcourts.gov electronically serve a

copy of this motion to:

Daucie Schindler

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Daucie.schindler@pdo.hctx.net

/s/ Jessica A. Caird Jessica A. Caird Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002-1923 (713) 274-5826 caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net TBC No. 24000608 Date: December 21, 2015

Case Details

Case Name: Travis Marcellaus Edwards v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 21, 2015
Docket Number: 01-15-00418-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.