History
  • No items yet
midpage
Travis Buntin v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Travis Buntin v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
487 P.3d 595
Alaska
2021
Check Treatment

TRAVIS BUNTIN v. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Supreme Court Nos. S-17309/17519

In the Supreme Court of the State of Alaska

June 11, 2021

U.S. District Court No. 3:16-CV-00073 (TMB)

ORDER

Withdraw and Reissue Opinion

Before: Bolger, Chief Justice, Winfree, Maassen, Carney, and Borghesan, Justices

Having considered Travis Buntin‘s Petition for Rehearing and Schlumberger Technology Corporation‘s response,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED IN PART but otherwise DENIED, and:

  1. Opinion No. 7521 issued on April 23, 2021, is WITHDRAWN.
  2. Opinion No. 7535 is issued on June 11, 2021, in its place, revising footnote 82 as follows:

One question left open in today‘s decision is whether, in addition to being precluded from giving exemptions a narrow reading, Alaska courts are required to apply general federal rules of statutory interpretation methodologies in lieu of our “sliding scale approach,” see Mat-Su Valley Med. Ctr., LLC v. Bolinder, 427 P.3d 754, 763 (Alaska 2018), when deciding cases involving AWHA exemptions explicitly linked to federal interpretation, as white collar exemptions are. The parties did not brief or argue this issue, and we do not decide it today. We note, as some scholars have pointed out, that it is not entirely clear what the federal rules of statutory interpretation methodologies are, and, where they exist, or how binding they are. See Abbe R. Gluck, Intersystemic Statutory Interpretation: Methodology as “Law” and the Erie Doctrine, 120 YALE L. J. 1898, 1909-11 (2011) (noting that federal rules of statutory interpretation, with some notable exceptions, are largely unresolved).

Entered by direction of the court.

Clerk of the Appellate Courts

/s/

Meredith Montgomery

cc: Supreme Court Justices

Distribution:

Daniel Pace

Pace Law Offices

101 E. Ninth, #7A

Anchorage, AK 99501

Aaron D. Sperbeck

Birch Horton Bittner & Cherot

510 “L” Street, #700

Anchorage, AK 99501

Timothy W. Seaver

Seaver & Wagner, LLC

500 “L” Street, #501

Anchorage, AK 99501

Martin J. Regimbal

Jennifer D. Sims

The Kullman Firm, P.L.C.

119 Third Street S., #2

Columbus MS 39701

Kenneth Legacki

Kenneth W. Legacki, PC

2207 Spenard Road, #209

Anchorage, AK 99501

Samuel Zurik, III

Robert P. Lombardi

Bryan Edward Bowdler

The Kullman Firm, P.L.C.

1100 Poydras Street, #1600

New Orleans, LA 70163

William J. Evans

Sedor Wendlandt Evans & Filippi, LLC

500 “L” Street, #500

Anchorage, AK 99501

Case Details

Case Name: Travis Buntin v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Travis Buntin v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Court Name: Alaska Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 11, 2021
Citation: 487 P.3d 595
Docket Number: S17309, S17519
Court Abbreviation: Alaska
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In