History
  • No items yet
midpage
Traitell v. Livingston
59 N.Y.S.2d 158
N.Y. App. Div.
1945
Check Treatment

In an action to recover commissions over and above salary actually paid and received, an affirmative defense alleges that the sum sued for represents an increase in earnings, the payment of which without approval of Federal agencies is violative of the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.), as amended, and as supplemented by Executive Orders and departmental regulations. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Traitell v. Livingston
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 19, 1945
Citation: 59 N.Y.S.2d 158
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.