75 Miss. 676 | Miss. | 1898
delivered the opinion of the court.
Looking to the parol proof offered to -be made at the trial and in the application for continuance, we think it clear that the tax receipt and the parol proof should have been received.
It inevitably follows that the survey made at the instance of the appellee would shed no light on the issue, for all the land called for by the Spanish grant in the tax receipt and on the assessment roll would thus be paid on, no matter where the government survey might have put it, and no matter, of course, how erroneously that survey might locate it.
The judgment is reversed, the verdict set aside amd the cause remanded.