History
  • No items yet
midpage
Town v. Wilcox
12 Wend. 503
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1834
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Savage, Ch, J.

The pleas are all good, considered in reference to the object for which they were pleaded. They are not pleaded puis darrein continuance. When matter of defence arises after the commencement of the suit, it cannot be pleaded in bar of the action generally ; but if before plea pleaded, it must be pleaded to the further maintenance of the suit. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 635. A plea puis darrein continuance sets up some matter arising after plea pleaded. The rules which govern such pleas are not applicable here.

The object of the pleas was to show a discontinuance of the suit; and that was done by showing that the suit, and all matters in difference, were submitted to arbitrators generally, without any stipulation to enter judgment upon their determination. 2 Wendell, 506. 18 Johns. R. 22.

Judgment for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Town v. Wilcox
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1834
Citation: 12 Wend. 503
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.