midpage

Town of Conklin v. RitterTown of Conklin v. Ritter

New York Court of Appeals
Feb 7, 2002
Versions:97 N.Y.2d 712
765 N.E.2d 851
739 N.Y.S.2d 355
2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The courts below correctly concluded that the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code applies to defendant’s building. Defendant’s remaining arguments are either unpreserved or without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Town of Conklin v. Ritter
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 7, 2002
Citations: 97 N.Y.2d 712; 765 N.E.2d 851; 739 N.Y.S.2d 355; 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In