History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tooker v. Maple
93 N.J. Eq. 224
N.J.
1921
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8. For reversal — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Kalisci-i, Williams, Van Buskirk — 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Tooker v. Maple
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 14, 1921
Citation: 93 N.J. Eq. 224
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.