Tooker v. Maple

93 N.J. Eq. 224 | N.J. | 1921

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8. For reversal — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Kalisci-i, Williams, Van Buskirk — 5.
midpage