History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tomlin v. State
110 Ga. 268
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

1. It is not an abuse of discretion to refuse to grant a continuance upon the ground of absent witnesses, where the applicant therefor fails to show afiirmatively to the court that the application is not made for delay, and where from all the facts before him the judge is warranted in finding that such-was the purpose for which the continuance is sought. Penal Code, §962.

Submitted November 6. Decided November 28, 1899. Indictment for assault with intent to murder. Before Judge Littlejohn. Chattahoochee superior court. March term, 1899. T. T. Miller and E. J. Wynn, for plaintiff in error. S. P. Gilbert, solicitor-general, contra.

2. There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment of the trial court refusing a new trial will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Tomlin v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 28, 1899
Citation: 110 Ga. 268
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.