History
  • No items yet
midpage
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rust
74 Ohio St. 3d 635
Ohio
1996
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct, but we consider public reprimand a sufficient sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 5-105(A) and (B) and 9-102(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rust
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 28, 1996
Citation: 74 Ohio St. 3d 635
Docket Number: No. 95-2128
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.