The appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds is disbarment. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner (1996),
Moreover, when appearing before the Ohio Hazardous Waste Facility Board, respondent engaged in contemptuous, undignified, and discourteous conduct. We recognize that an attorney must zealously represent his client, but we also recognize that an attorney has a duty to be civil to opposing counsel and the court. Respondent’s bullying tactics toward witnesses, opposing counsel, and the board that are revealed in the record of this hearing have no place in our jurisprudence. As we said in Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo (1996),
Respondent is hereby disbarred. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
