History
  • No items yet
midpage
35 Ohio St. 3d 261
Ohio
1988

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. While we adopt the findings of the board, we reject the sanction recommended. Respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for one year, that year being suspended on the condition that respondent satisfactorily complete a two-year probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Lochee, Holmes, *264Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Moyer, C-J-,

dissenting. I dissent from the majority opinion. I would adopt the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Bar and suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months.

Case Details

Case Name: Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 16, 1988
Citations: 35 Ohio St. 3d 261; 520 N.E.2d 223; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 61; D.D. No. 87-13
Docket Number: D.D. No. 87-13
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer, 35 Ohio St. 3d 261