midpage

Toft v. KetchumToft v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 20, 1955
Versions:114 A.2d 863
52 A.L.R. 2d 1208
18 N.J. 611
1955 N.J. LEXIS 280
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Waehenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N. J. 280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For reversal — Justices Wacheneeld and Burling — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: Toft v. Ketchum
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 20, 1955
Citations: 114 A.2d 863; 52 A.L.R. 2d 1208; 18 N.J. 611; 1955 N.J. LEXIS 280
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In