History
  • No items yet
midpage
Toffel v. Baugher
133 So. 2d 420
Fla.
1961
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari because our preliminary examination of the record suggested a potential conflict with prior decisions of this Court in State ex rel. Weber v. Register, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 619, and, Strasser v. Linn, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 458.

After oral argument and a thorough examination of the record and briefs we have the view that the District Court of Appeal has, by its opinion, accurately distinguished the instant case from the prior allegedly conflicting decisions of this Court. Toffel, Trustee v. Baugher et al., Fla.App., 125 So.2d 321.

We therefore conclude that the record under review is devoid of any jurisdictional conflict with prior decisions. Art. V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Toffel v. Baugher
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 4, 1961
Citation: 133 So. 2d 420
Docket Number: No. 31065
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.