177 A.D. 112 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1917
Lead Opinion
The defendant has demurred to the complaint upon the grounds (1) that the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue, in that it appears upon the face of the .complaint that the cause of action alleged, if any, is vested in an organization known as Camp No. 2 of the Order of the Golden Seal, and upon the further ground that the plaintiff is not a member of said Order of the Golden Seal, and (2) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer, which is to the amended complaint, has been overruled, and the defendant appeals from the order.
Under the liberal rules now in vogue in reference to pleadings it is conceded on the part of the defendant that if any cause of action may be spelled out of the allegations of fact contained in the complaint the order should prevail, but it is insisted that under this rule the complaint is fatally defective under both suggestions of the demurrer. The original complaint was held defective upon demurrer, on the ground that the defendant, having lawfully come into possession of the funds, it was necessary to allege a demand and a refusal in order to make the holding wrongful, and the amended complaint is identical with •the original complaint, with the exception that it is now alleged, not that a demand was made prior to the commencement of the action, but that ‘ ‘ plaintiff on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated has demanded the said sum of money heretofore mentioned from the defendant, but no part has been paid to this plaintiff or any other person similarly situated as plaintiff is informed and believes, to their great damage.” We will pass over the question of whether such an allegation is sufficient to overcome the original defect in the pleading, and look into the complaint to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to maintain this action. Disregarding the order of the plaintiff’s allegations, and for an understanding of the case, we
It is alleged that the Superintendent of Insurance on the 11th day of March, 1902, issued a final certificate of authority to “ The Order of the Golden Seal,” by which it was duly authorized to transact business, and that said order was duly constituted a body politic and corporate with the powers and privileges of a fraternal, beneficiary society, order or association; that thereafter said Order of the Golden Seal adopted a constitution and by-laws to govern the same; that article 3, section 1, of said constitution provided that local camps shall consist of at least fifteen members who have been duly elected and initiated according to the ritual of the order, and none except such shall be allowed a voice or vote in its meetings; that section 2 of the same article provided that camps are to be organized by the supreme organizer or by his authority, and no additional camp shall be organized in a place where one exists without his consent; that section 4 of the same article provides that members of the respective camps shall elect officers for their own government and hold meetings for the transaction of business in accordance with the by-laws, and shall be governed as the constitution prescribes; that by-law 37 provided that quarterly dues shall be paid by each member holding a certificate upon the cash dividend plan to the camp to which he belongs, and shall not be less than fifty cents per quarter, or two dollars per annum; such quarterly dues shall be paid to the local secretary, and one half thereof shall be retained by such local secretary in full payment for his services in performing the duties of his office and the balance thereof shall be paid by such local secretary to the treasurer of his local camp; that subsequent to the issuing of the certificate of authority by the Superintendent of Insurance, it appeared upon the policies issued that certain policyholders were members of Camp No. 2, Order of the Golden Seal, and that Joel L. Keator was local secretary, and further that no local camp, as provided by the by-laws and the constitution of said order, was ever kept or maintained by said Joel L. Keator, the local secretary of said Camp No. 2; that no officers were ever elected and that no meetings of said Camp No. 2 were ever held or policyholders were ever initi
Of course the defendant does not admit the conclusions of the complaint; he is merely committed for the purposes of the demurrer to the facts which are alleged and which enter into the alleged cause of action and the prayer for relief, which it is well to consider demands that the plaintiff and
The pleader seems to be laboring under a great confusion of thought. There is no allegation that the plaintiff is now a policyholder or that he or any other member of the said Camp No. 2 has suffered any loss of rights under such'policy or policies or that they are likely to suffer any loss. Their contracts of insurance are with “The Order of the Golden Seal,” a “ body politic and corporate with the powers and privileges of a fraternal, beneficiary society, order or association,” as alleged in the complaint, and the provisions of the constitution and by-laws of such order referred to in the complaint, and which provide for the origination of subordinate camps, are merely for the purpose of bringing that corporation within the provisions of article 7 of the Insurance Law. (See Insurance Law [Gen. Laws, chap. 38; Laws of 1892, chap. 690], § 233; Insurance
It seems to us clear that the plaintiff, has no legal capacity to maintain this action, and, in any event, that he has failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The order and interlocutory judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the demurrer sustained, with costs.
All concurred, Kellogg, P. J., in memorandum.
Concurrence Opinion
It is a fair inference from the complaint that Camp No. 2 was authorized by the supreme organizer, or by his authority, or by the parent camp, and that the defendant was designated by such authority to act as secretary of the local camp, assumably until local officers were duly elected. The policyholders, at or near Griffin Corners, from their certificates, apparently
The moneys paid the local secretary were properly paid to him, and one-half of them are the funds of the local camp to be turned over to the treasurer when elected for the use of the camp. The plaintiff paid his part of the moneys strictly according to the by-laws, and has no further interest in them except to see that they are used for purposes of the local camp. The local camp not having been organized, perhaps any member, in behalf of all of the members, might maintain an action if the moneys had been actually misapplied by the defendant, there being no official in existence who could maintain said' action. There is no allegation of facts indicating that the defendant has misapplied the moneys, or has actually converted them to his own use. The allegation of the complaint that the defendant has not paid the money over to the treasurer, there being none, and that no camp was maintained, and that the money was not paid over by defendant for the benefit of the local camp, but was retained and converted to his own use and not paid over to the local camp, is not an allegation of the conversion of the funds. From all that appears the funds are still retained by the defendant as local secretary, according to his duty, ready to be turned over to the treasurer when the members of the local "camp shall elect one. The failure by the defendant to turn over the moneys to the plaintiff and others on demand was not a conversion; the defendant could not lawfully pay over the moneys to them. There is no statement of fact showing a conversion. The conclusions alleged do not follow the facts alleged, and there is nothing in the complaint to show any illegal act upon the part of the defendant.
Order and interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with usual leave to the plaintiff to plead over on payment of costs in this court and at Special Term.