History
  • No items yet
midpage
Todd v. Crookshanks
3 Johns. 432
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1808
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There was no foundation for the action below. After the note was paid, and a receipt in full given, by one of the payees, it was completely discharged, so as to be of no value. The note did not belong to the plaintiff, and it might be useful to Todd, the other payee, who was a co-executor, to show that he had not received the money. An action of trover will lie for a note in the hands of a third person ; but such an action as this was never before brought.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Todd v. Crookshanks
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1808
Citation: 3 Johns. 432
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.