Tobin v. Tobin
32 Pa. Super. 186
Pa. Super. Ct.
1906
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.