120 P. 1066 | Cal. | 1912
The appeals here presented were taken from an order denying the several motions of the appealing defendants to set aside a judgment and to relieve them from a default entered against them.
The action was upon a promissory note executed to the plaintiff by the King Land and Improvement Company, Charles Kern, W.J. King, G.W. Burleigh, A.C. Black, H.E. Smith, H.C. Cartmell, C.R. Ward, Robert McFadden, William L. Inness, and Albert Fuller, all of whom were made defendants. The appealing defendants are Black, Smith, Cartmell, Inness, Fuller, and Kern, each of whom had suffered a default to be taken and entered against him. The defaults of all except Kern were entered by the clerk on January 4, 1909. Kern joined in an answer with the other defendants, Ward, Burleigh, and McFadden, but at the beginning of the trial, to wit, on June 1, 1909, he withdrew therefrom and thereupon his default was duly entered by the court. The judgment was rendered on March 3, 1910. The motion to have the defaults and the judgment set aside was made on May 16, 1910.
It is apparent that the applications to set aside the defaults came too late. They were made under the provisions of section
The proposition that the taking and entering of a default is not a "proceeding taken against" the party in default, within the meaning of section
Under these circumstances the court below was justified in refusing appellants any relief. We are not to be understood as intimating that on the merits there was a sufficient case of excusable neglect established.
The order is affirmed.
*47Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.