History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tissot v. Throckmorton
6 Cal. 471
Cal.
1856
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Heydeneflt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The objection that the wife is improperly joined comes too late; it should have been taken advantage of by demurrer.

The defence set up as a reason for a continuance, or for a new trial, is not maintainable in this form. The defendant obtained for his note a deed to the land; if he can avoid the payment, he must give up the land, or he should have offered to surrender the deed to be canceled, so that both parties could have been remitted to their original rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tissot v. Throckmorton
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 6 Cal. 471
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.