Tirado v. KoritzTirado v. Koritz
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the second ordering paragraph and that part of the third ordering paragraph directing plaintiffs to provide an authorization permitting the release of certain medical records, and by directing plaintiffs to
In view of the injuries alleged by plaintiffs, we conclude that Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in directing plaintiffs to submit to the court for in camera review a certified complete copy of plaintiff‘s records from Sadiqa Karim, M.D., Quest Diagnostic and X-Cell Laboratories of WNY (see Tabone v Lee, 59 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2009]; Mayer v Cusyck, 284 AD2d 937 [2001]; Carter v Fantauzzo, 256 AD2d 1189, 1190 [1998]). “In bringing the action, plaintiff waived the physician-patient privilege only with respect to the physical and mental conditions affirmatively placed in controversy” (Mayer, 284 AD2d at 938). “That waiver, however, ‘does not permit wholesale discovery of information regarding [plaintiff‘s] physical and mental condition. The waiver of the physician-patient privilege made by a party who affirmatively asserts a physical condition in its pleading does not permit discovery of information involving unrelated illnesses and treatments’ ” (Carter, 256 AD2d at 1190).
The court abused its discretion, however, in directing plaintiffs to provide authorizations permitting the release of plaintiff‘s medical records from Daniel Leary, M.D. and Sadiqa Karim, M.D. that “are related to any condition(s) or disease(s) of the abdomen or pelvis, as well as [to] those [conditions or diseases] that are gynecological or obstetrical in nature.” The court, rather than those medical providers, is in the best position “to determine whether the records are material and related to any physical or mental condition placed in issue by plaintiffs” (Tabone, 59 AD3d at 1022). We therefore modify the order accordingly. The court properly directed plaintiffs to provide
We conclude, however, that plaintiffs’ “broad allegations of injury” also place the medical history of plaintiff predating the hysterectomy in controversy (Geraci v National Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 255 AD2d 945, 946 [1998]). The court therefore should have directed plaintiffs to submit to the court for in camera review a certified complete copy of plaintiff‘s records from Community Blue and Empire Medical Services prior to October 15, 2007. We therefore further modify the order accordingly. We remit the matter to Supreme Court for an in camera review of plaintiff‘s medical records from Dr. Leary and plaintiff‘s medical records from Community Blue and Empire Medical Services prior to October 15, 2007 to determine whether they are material and related to any physical or mental condition placed in issue by plaintiffs.
Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith and Green, JJ.