History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tinsley v. Jones
169 Ky. 279
Ky. Ct. App.
1916
Check Treatment

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Dismissing appeal.

In this action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff, Julia Tinsley, recovered of the defendant, Fred Gr. Jones, a verdict and judgment for $750.00. A new trial was awarded, and on the second trial she recovered a verdict and judgment for $350.00. Plaintiff was granted an appeal below and defendant prosecutes a cross-appeal.

Since the purpose of the appeal is to substitute the first judgment for that rendered on the second trial, the amount in controversy on the original appeal is the difference between the two judgments, or-the sum of $400.00. The amount in controversy on the cross-appeal by the defendant is the amount of the second judgment, or the sum of $350.00.

A circuit court has no authority to grant an appeal from a judgment for money, where the amount in controversy is less than $500.00, exclusive of interest and costs. Kentucky Statutes, section 950; Childers, et al v. Ratliff, et al, 164 Ky. 123, 175 S.W. 25. In such a case the appeal will be dismissed, and where the amount in controversy on the cross-appeal is less than the jurisdictional amount, the cross-appeal will follow the original appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tinsley v. Jones
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Mar 21, 1916
Citation: 169 Ky. 279
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.